Does Ghost
Rider: Spirit of Vengeance redeem the franchise or cast it further
into reboot hell? Note: major plot spoilers ahead!
Do I have something in my teeth? |
The plot is fairly
simple: Johnny Blaze (Nicholas Cage, Raising Arizona) wants the
soul-sucking Ghost Rider out of his system. Enter a priest (Iris
Elba, Thor) who promises to do just that if Blaze will help rescue
a boy with magical powers who is to be sacrificed by the Devil (Ciarán Hinds, Tinker Tailor Solider Spy),
thus making the dark lord all powerful on earth. This will, of course,
bring a smashing end to all things Earthly, as the Devil will assume the boy’s
body, making him immortal, and plunging the Earth into darkness.
Yeah. It’s not long before the film descends into tired clichés,
punctuated by silly, unnecessary one-liners and therefore adhering to the worst
of modern cinematic sin: that CGI can save a movie when errors of story are
present. This point is proven true at several moments throughout the
film, as Cage struggles to separate his identity from that of the Rider, then
learning he’s carrying an assassin angel under his leathers, only to get Rider
back just in time for an unappealing and flat climax.
There are many unconvincing aspects about Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance which present unavoidable and destructive consequences for the film. Poor casting decisions (particularly with the boy and his mother) along with failure to use talent effectively pop up in several key sequences. Even the appearance of Christopher Lambert (Highlander) as lead priest near the film’s end is just not given enough screen time. Lambert’s unique presence could have upped the ante, providing greater character conflict for Cage; but their scenes together feel rushed which ultimately kills any pseudo-cameo feeling. Johnny Whitworth’s bad guy is only moderately appealing, even when the Devil pimps his ride, turning Whitworth into a lethal flesh-eating hitman. There’s simply no incentive for the audience to love these characters, and the funny scenes (Blaze’s urination sequence is pretty good) are too few and far between to be relevant to the story.
Did someone fart up in here? Oh, it's the movie that stinks. |
However,
the film is visually appealing, with directors Taylor and Neveldine bringing
their Crank sensibilities and merging those with some neat
anime sequences at the beginning and middle of the film. There is an
insightful behind-the-scenes short featuring the antics of the directors,
currently featured on YouTube that is far more interesting than anything in
this film. Some of the wire acts to get Taylor into shot are as detailed
as the actual stunts themselves. Even with all this effort, Taylor and
Neveldine are not kings of silver screen drama, but they can only do so
much with a 95-minute script that arrives spun out on the side of the
road. Finally, a notice to Hollywood: stop post-producing 3D.
If you cannot afford the cameras at the time a film is shot, then drop
the concept. GH's post-3D treatment is unnecessary and
actually gets in the way for those of us sporting glasses. If you're like
me and see 3D as an inconvenient distraction, then save your money and either
see the film in 2D or skip it altogether.
GRSOV will make good money in its
first week. Cage fans will see this, because that's how Cage fans are.
But the film doesn't have enough to survive in theaters for very long.
Expect both a serious falloff after Week 2 and talk about a reboot soon
after. It’s no wonder that critics were discouraged from posting reviews
prior to its release, and serves proof that Marvel’s spinoff group, Marvel
Knights, needs more focus and better storytellers before it can compete.
Your time would be better spent getting ready for The Avengers by
re-watching that franchise and waiting for Ghost Rider: Spirit of
Vengeance to show up soon on video. After February, this one
might be hard to find in theaters.
Comments